VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] (no subject)

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] (no subject)
From: kevin kaufhold <kkaufhold@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Thanks Tad for the comment on they QST article. 

As to the strong uptick in June, I think it is related to both the HF + 6 rigs 
and the club competition since 2003.  I wrote a prior article comparing June as 
well as CQ VHF to January. It is at NCJ, Jan / Feb 2007, at 25, "Are Changes 
Blowing in the Wind". In that article, I suggested that there was a definite 
linkage between the profileration of HF + 6 rigs as well as the club 
competition and the increase in June logs.  I believe July CQ VHF is also 
benefitting from the HF + 6 rigs, even without a club competition.  

Kevin 
W9GKA



Message: 1
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:37:29 -0500
From: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] October QST article by W9GKA
To: VHF contesting list <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <4AB524E9.90804@suddenlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Kevin, congratulations on the excellent article on VHF contesting trends 
in QST!  I enjoyed the historical commentary and your data analysis of 
the log entries by contest and year.  Do you think the recent uptrend in 
June contest logs is related to the availability of HF+50 MHz rigs from 
most every manufacturer?

Thanks and 73,

-- 
Tad Danley, K3TD
EM10dq


      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>