Last time i checked 144.188 is not the beacon subband.. 144.288 is and
I Believe there has been propnet beacons running on this frequency for
several years now..
Now this is this a issue???
IMHO.. I'm not sure why Ev doesn't use 144 .155 or something.. down
around where all the other narrow band digital stuff is..
w9Ray
Jeff Thomas wrote:
> For those that value the 2m beacons...
>
> It seems that W2EV (Ev) has announced a weekly PropNet PSK net right in the
> middle of the 2m beacon sub-band. Ev has chosen to use 144.188 out of 4 MHz
> of spectrum with much better places for such operations. Yeah, you read that
> right.
>
> The issue of this poor frequency choice has been brought to Ev's attention
> and he continues to pursue this. It appears to be a rather childish and
> strange choice in order to attract the attention of VHF/UHF Weak Signal folks
> to his particular pet project. You would think if he was truly interested in
> attracting PSK folks, he'd operate the net in a much better portion of the 2m
> spectrum. Yeah, I'm baffled at the logic too.
>
> Ev is on this list, so this is not me going behind his back. He's been
> contacted on this before and has yet to justify the frequency choice.
>
>
> 73
> Jeff
> WA4ZKO
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.31/2264 - Release Date: 07/26/09
> 11:07:00
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|