VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Rule 3.3.1....

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Rule 3.3.1....
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:28:21 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Steve - You wrote:

"The rules, as currently written, actively encourages manufactured  
contacts and grid circing. That is true of all three rover categories,  
although there are some limits for Classic and Limited Rover...."

I think that the problem is quite the opposite; it is the passive  
nature of the rules with respect to coordinated roving activity that  
allow it to exist in the limited and rover categories. If the ARRL  
rule makers and implementers wanted to outlaw captive roving and other  
coordinated roving activity in the limited and classic rover  
categories, they could do so in the rules. I am not sure that the  
rules as currently written in the limited category give much of an  
advantage to coordinated roving activity over conventional roving.

I am not sure what a manufactured contact is. I think you are talking  
about the coordinated roving activity. But why is that any more  
manufactured than making skeds with other stations before the contest  
begins? That is a well established practice.

I think we should reserve comments on whether or not coordinated  
roving is a problem in the limited class until the scores are in. -  
Duffey
--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] Rule 3.3.1...., James Duffey <=