VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Another antenna question

To: VHF List <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu>, VHF Contesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Another antenna question
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Therefore I am now thinking about running a simple Hamstick
> dipole setup for 6 meters since a loop is nothing more than
> a dipole with the ends folded around into a loop/square.

<snip>

> It should work as well as a loop, shouldn't it?
-------------------------------------------------------------

Jacob,
Every antenna has its' own characteristics and trade-offs.  You must first 
decide what you want to accomplish.  Then, use the antenna that gets you to 
that goal.

A halo radiates equally well (within a dB or so) in all directions.  It is a 
bit more complex to build. See: http://www.macnaughtonart.com/halo.htm

A dipole radiates better, broadside to the antenna (a dB better than a halo) 
and poorer off the ends (several dB's lower than a halo).  It is the easiest of 
all antennas to build. See: 
http://www.wx7s.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/necwinazimuthal.jpg

Which will meet your goals?  Only you can decide.

Good luck,
Ev, W2EV



      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Another antenna question, Ev Tupis <=