Les,
Ev, had what I would call a better response. Here is mine, and I must say I
reluctantly want to get into this game. You and others have been asked to
STOP flooding this reflector about rule opinions. If you do not understand
the sponsor's rules, why post rule questions so other interpretations are
flooding the reflector. Some might be on target and others may not. As Ev
suggested, simply go to the sponsor (Sean at the ARRL) and ask for a strict
interpretation. At that point you can post the Q&A response so all of us
know the correct answer.
Steve
K1IIG
>
>> It occurred to me that I had a perfectly good Kenwood TH-F6A
>> in the truck that puts out five watts on 2, 440, and 222.
>> Would it have been legal and/or ethical to simply "hand"
>> them the radio and invite them to participate in the contest
>> by working me on the spot?
>
> The issue of "legal" is better asked after having read and understood the
> rules for the event as published by the sponsor. Every one is different.
> Applying one sponsor's rules to other sponsor's events is meaningless.
>
> For instance, ARRL contests prohibit 'log-submitting participants' (a
> powerful phrase and highly exploitable loophole) from using one
> transceiver under more than one call sign in a contest. VHF Sprint
> contests have no such rule in place.
>
> The issue of "ethical" is entirely different, and is quite complex and
> subjective; even arguable (some believe that this is the reason for the
> existence of e-mail lists <g>)
>
> Regards,
> Ev, W2EV
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|