VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Log Periodic Antenna Performance?

To: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Log Periodic Antenna Performance?
From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:41:39 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com> wrote:

> I'm now in the process of drafting a proposal to allow the erection of a 45 
> foot tower my back yard, with a single log periodic antenna and rotor. The 
> hardline feedline would be connected to an "A/B" switch to allow the signals 
> to be routed to either my television set or the ham shack.

Mike wrote

There are a number of "reasonable accommodation" laws which probably
what was used here.  I'm not sure if 45' falls under "reasonable
accommodation" but its sure worth a shot.  There is also the unwritten
"rule of incrementalism".  Get a modest 20-25' tower up and then inch
it up to 30'.  A couple of years later 35' until you reach your
desired height or hit a hard spot with the HOA.

There are a few LPDA's for V/UHF out there.  Cushcraft used to have
one.  KMA has a couple, I'll have to go through my links page
http://ka5cvh.com/radio/product_links.htm and see if I find any more.

-- 
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com
http://twitter.com/KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com/political/sick.pdf

There is only one church,
and one set of rules.
And God wrote the rules,
not the church.
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>