VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Drawing conclusions [Was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions

To: VHF Contesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Drawing conclusions [Was: Endorse Rover Rules Revisions EXCEPT the 30 Q Limit
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: w2ev@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:37:14 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
--- On Wed, 2/18/09, Mike Metroka <VHFRover@aol.com> wrote:
> Obviously from the responses from several active Rovers,
> the idea of activating a grid only once during the contest
> is flawed and discussion should probably be dropped or the
> proposal modified.

The responses that we see are based on the ability to comment proactively and 
nothing more.  We would have seen similar threads, had the ARRL folk floated 
previous rover rules through this list prior to implementation, too.  They 
didn't...they were just implemented without public comment.

fwiw

Ev, W2EV



      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>