Tom, I have to agree with you. If this "extremely simple rule" were
put in place it would kill almost all rover activity. We're not out
here driving around on expensive gas just to serve the stationary
stations, much as the attitudes of some others seem to indicate. If
this change is ok, what's wrong with "stationary station to
stationary station" contacts don't count? Why not? How, if this is an
OK restriction for rovers should it not apply to the stationary stations?
Rover rule critics: Why do people so have it out for the "evil"
rovers!?!?!? We're not pissing in your class rules, don't piss all over ours.
kr0ver/r
"Rover-to-Rover QSO's do not count for contest credit." That would
>certainly encourage rovers
>to create stations that are equipped to make QSO's over greater
>distances and with other stations.
>
>This rule change would certainly encourage this rover to just stay home.
>
>73,
>
>Tom K6EU aka K6EU/r
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|