the term rover witch hunt is exactly what I was talking about last month.
People on the VUAC specificly addressed the beahvior of some rovers in public
forums and created a set of rules to make a comprimise. The group ignored the
comprimise and now the VUAC has to address it again. And you call this a witch
hunt.
There is always false acusations in the world, public logs will show everyone
the data and someone would have to point to the data to prove their case to the
contest comittee. This would occur after the award is awarded. Unless there
is blatent cheating (which is a term you(AA5JG) say we use but we never said
these guys are cheating.)
The Data will show the value of all the contacts in the contest and if the data
shows that repetative contatcts between a limited number of stations causes a
win as compared to stations who work sereral people then the contesting
comunity and the CAC will have to decide how to deal with the issue. Certainly
if grid circlers feel contacts are as valuable as people; who work stations
they can not see they will post the logs in full daylight and with pride in the
manner they achieved their victory.
Full disclosure equals full honesty. Honest logs will be honest logs.
Contoversial methods will be honest as they are now.
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122008
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|