VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Let's put it this way ...

To: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Let's put it this way ...
From: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:57:47 -0700
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Going way beyond reality is a notable theme of this thread. I'm left 
thinking that the two main bashers must feel they could not make a case if 
they stuck with the facts.

Jim, AF6O

> I'm going to try to make this my last word on the subject.  I think some 
> people are getting pretty worked up over this and making accusations that 
> go way beyond what is reality.  I can see that we will never as a group 
> agree on all of this.
>
> I will make one parting observation and hope that those reading and 
> posting here will step back and consider the following.  Unlimited Rover 
> was established for the express purpose of making sure that a class exists 
> for those who want to circle the girds as a group, without putting them in 
> with those who don't.  The entire class is based on that premise.  Can we 
> all agree that the goal has not been met?
>
> If the goal has not been met, we are left with what to do about it.  We 
> can change the rules or we can go back to having one single rover class. 
> Or we can ignore the gorilla standing in the corner and just keep it like 
> it is.
>
> Steve
> K4GUN/R
 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>