For many of us the 7700 and 7800 are not options. But,
even if they were, it would be a real decision for me
to spend that much more money when my ProIII clearly
works very well for me. My only complaint would be
that the noise blanker is non-functional on broad
pulse powerline noise.
K7CW
--- Gregg Seidl <k9kl@centurytel.net> wrote:
> I used a 756 PRO II until I got my 7800 then I used
> the 7800 on 6 with the
> II as a backup until I got my 7700.The 756 is a fine
> rig,the scope is GREAT
> at helping you see an opening.You won't be
> disappointed with a III.They are
> great radios.I've heard reports of some liking the
> 7700 better then the 7800
> on 6 meters,I haven't had enough time to really
> compare but the 7800 is
> simply FANTASTIC.Coupled to a PW-1 amp it is simply
> wonderful to use. Gregg
> K9KL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|