VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers

To: Bruce Richardson <w9fz@w9fz.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers
From: N6FD <n6fd@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:09:58 -0800
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Bruce Richardson W9FZ/R  wrote:

> Those two logs mean 644 QSOs. So far, there are 43 matches
> which is like a 7% rate.  Most QSLs by number go to K9NS and
> N2BJ--but there are others.
>
>   
That is a pretty good QSL rate on VHF+ contacts in my experience.  That 
will probably get better when the ARRL gets VUCC working for LoTW (hint 
HINT!).  Entering all the operating locations is a bit of a pain, but 
necessary for getting the awards right.  One thing they could do to help 
is automatically duplicate rover contacts as both CALL and CALL/R.  Not 
sure if this would be a big deal in rewriting the LoTW software.
2¢
73, Erich N6FD DM15do


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>