I noticed the same thing. They listed the QSO points instead of the
number of QSO's.
Actually seeing the QSO points is more value to me than the number of
QSO's. It kinda shows the value of the higher frequency Q's but I need
the actual numbers to make any sense out of it.
73,
Jim K3LFO/R
specrisk@aol.com wrote:
> To the list:
>
> Did anyone notice the inconsistency in how the scores database? and line
> scores list QSO's for some entrants and? QSO Points( QSO's X higher band
> credit) for others. The column lists "QSO's" so it appears that some stations
> had many more QSOs than they actually did. QSO's and QSO points are the same
> if a station only works 6 and 2 meters but are totally different with higher
> bands due to the? multiplier for higher bands. The database needs an
> additional column or there has to be some way to show QSO's for everyone. You
> can observe what I am talking about by multiplying the numbers in the column
> listed as QSO's times the multipliers (grids). In some cases it works out to
> the final score and in other cases it works out lower. I am not suggesting
> there is a problem in actual scores or standing but rather the way it is
> exhibited.? If I am incorrect in my observation please let me know.
>
> George Vaccaro, W1JHR
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|