To: | "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>,"Rogers, Ron" <RR124640@ncr.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS vs. Real-time logging |
From: | <w0eea@sbbco.net> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:44:31 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
>> The rules of the contest don't mention anything about every QSO exchange >> must be based clearly on "chance" or "accidental discovery". > > That's an interesting idea. I'd be in favor of that change. > > -- > Kenneth E. Harker WM5R I regularly make skeds before a contest begins. Also: Multioperator and Single Operator Assisted stations may use spotting nets. I would be absolutely against any change in the rules that would prevent either. Jim Smith W0EEA _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS vs. Real-time logging, Kenneth E. Harker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting, gmitch |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS vs. Real-time logging, Kenneth E. Harker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS vs. Real-time logging, Kenneth E. Harker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |