VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW rule question

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW rule question
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----
From: Bill Burgess <ve3cru@rac.ca>

I have made a qso of 12 miles on 432 without an antenna.
<snip>
Now, was that a disqualified qso?
---------------------------

I've done similar things by accident on 1.2 GHz.  I view the antenna as 
"whatever is doing the radiating", even if it isn't the *intended* radiator.

Unless W1XX says differently, work 'em and log 'em.  :)

Ev, W2EV






       
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
 for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>