VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment
From: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Reply-to: ray@w9ray.org
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:43:31 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
yeah,  but you are using the internet and repeaters to solicit 
contacts.... kinda...


W9RAY
Ray J


Rogers, Ron wrote:
> Ray, 
> I don't think he is referring to using APRS for actually making a contest 
> contact. I think he is referring to using APRS to simply report real-time 
> positioning and locations of the rover so you can attempt contact with them 
> on another frequency.
>  
> Ron
> WW8RR
>  
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vhfcontesting-bounces@contesting.com on behalf of Ray J
> Sent: Thu 3/1/2007 8:16 PM
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment
>
>
>
> you cannot use regular aprs on 144.390.. because it uses repeaters..
> (digipeaters)  and internet relays..
>
> I don't see how it would be considered illegal to use regular simplex
> packet using the same software/firmware as regular aprs systems..  
> minus the active repeaters and the internet..and  not on 144.39
>
> its a simple 2 way simplex qso..
>
>
> Ray J
> W9RAY
>
>
> Dave Agsten wrote:
>   
>> Right On Ron,
>>   
>>   Also, it would nice if the ARRL & CQ opened their eyes and allowed APRS to 
>> be used in the VHF/UHF contests. Many, many times while roving I hear 
>> stations that don't have their beams pointed in my direction. I call and 
>> call with no response or they hear me weakly and don't think to rotate their 
>> antennas. It ends up wasting valuable contesting time when, if APRS were 
>> allowed, permanent stations would be able to see Rovers, rotate their 
>> antennas, and generate more contacts and grids in less time. Also, Rovers 
>> could see other Rovers and not operate on top of each other. Rather than 
>> going to the same grid, Rovers could choose to activate a different grid 
>> based upon knowing where other Rovers were operating from. It's a win win 
>> situation. I've never figured out how the use of APRS is much different than 
>> knowing where one permanent station is located from another and pointing 
>> your antennas accordingly.
>>   
>>   And, as far as "waste" of spectrum is concerned, I see more waste from 
>> some very high powered, over-driven stations in every VHF/UHF contest.
>>   
>>   73,
>>   Dave N8AG (ex W4TXS)
>>
>>       
>> ---------------------------------
>> Looking for earth-friendly autos?
>>  Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
>
>   


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>