To: | VHF Contesting eMail Remailer <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...] |
From: | Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> |
Date: | Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:35:11 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Ev Tupis wrote: >> Not to mention, the rules STILL say if I'm transmitting >> on VHF I gotta shut down the APRS, digis or no digis... >> right? Completely silly and annoying... but I did it. > > Unless you got this ruling from the ARRL, I would treat it as suspect. I > don't see anything in the ARRL rules to support this. I interpreted the rules restricting no more than one transmitter active per band to mean that if the APRS is on VHF, the VHF SSB must be off, or vice-versa. Wouldn't you agree? Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Some Real Rover Data, wb2odhjim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Wanna Be, frank bechdoldt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [Roving...], Paul Kiesel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...], Ev Tupis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |