To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] poll |
From: | "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:15:49 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Well I guess you could level a similar allegation against me. I made a deliberate decision to operate from my home QTH in California instead of moving somewhere back East where I could work a lot more stations. Your assertion is absurd and once again you are incorrect. They made a deliberate decision to go to a place that much study had revealed would make it possible to visit the greatest number of grids during the contest period. Nobody is under any obligation to operate from a high population density area. It is clear that you are hell bent on denigrating the N6NB rovers and it is equally apparent that you feel no need to employ factual information when doing so. > Im not saying they lied, I am saying they made a deliberate decision to > work > no one but thierselfs by going someplace where no one lives. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover behavior: How about trying to address"it" withOUT having to define "it"?, Bruce Richardson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...], Ev Tupis |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] poll, frank bechdoldt |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] poll, frank bechdoldt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |