John,
The reason you are being accused of being a captive rover is because of your
score in the 2004 June contest where you went out to WTX and placed 4th over
all and out scored the next rover (W3IY) by 812,997 points and the two
others you grid cricled with actually placed higher scores than you did!
Come on, it doesn't take common sense to realize something is wrong here.
73 Matt
W5LL
----- Original Message -----
From: <N6MU1@aol.com>
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:08 AM
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Some Real Rover Data
> I'm getting tired of being accused of being a captive rover who only works
> other rovers while 500 feet apart. Here's some real data from the June
> contest
> and is typical of our operations. The team of N6MU and N6HC had the top
> Rover
> score. We travelled with W6XD while activating 16 grids here in CA. Of the
> 21
> hours of operation only 4 were spent working W6XD. The other 17 were spent
> working everyone we could hear and generated 354 Qs. Captive rover? Many
> stations
> were worked on multiple bands from multiple grids. Captive rover? Like
> everyone else, a great deal of time was spent chasing DX on 6 resulting in
> 58 grids
> on that band. Captive rover? Stations like VE7AHA, KB0HH, K7CW, VA6AN and
> AL1VE/R were worked from multiple grids. Captive rover?
>
> These accusations are simply not true! Also, creating a separate category
> for
> less than 10 and probably less than 5 stations makes no sense to me. 73...
>
> John, N6MU
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|