Tom Carney wrote:
> Tom Carney wrote:
>
>> Another problem you will encounter. Some people will log a rover with
>> out the /r. This results in a mis-match in LOTW, IE not a confirmed
>> QSL. With eQSL you see these QSO as un-confirmed contacts. While I was
>> uploading to eQSL, I got almost as many QSL without the /r as with. I
>> suspect the same thing occurs with LOTW but have no way of knowing.
>>
>> 73, Tom K6EU aka K6EU/r
>>
>>
>
> Received a note from Paul, AA4ZZ indicating that LOTW should match up a
> /r QSO record with a non /r one. I checked and he is correct, my bad.
> So if you upload from a /r certificate LOTW will match QSO submitted to
> your non /r call.
>
> 73, Tom K6EU
Completely missed requirements in the database design specification,
would be the root-cause problem here.
Sounds like time for Version 2.
Nate
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|