To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half) |
From: | KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:18:50 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I definitely think that if LoTW supported VUCC, then a lot more VHFers would use it. I am currently converting all of my old paper logs to LoTW and got a QSL tonight from way back in 1979! 73, Erich KA6AMD DM15 R Johnson wrote: > [snip] > > LoTW works FB as far as it presently goes. > > It works better when you supply all of your station info !!! > > It would work even better if it supported "VUCC" !!! > [snip] > > 73 > Bob, K1VU > > > > _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half), Jim Forsyth |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers, John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half), Jim Forsyth |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers, John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |