I down loaded the Rover Log and it is much too complex for me. Does to many
things I am not interested in. Logging a QSO is not straight forward. Get
too many error messages.
Downloaded CT. It doesn't seem to run on my computer.
When one is computer stupid simplicity is needed.
VHF-DX works fine if someone could fix the band problem.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz@prairienet.org>
To: <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF-DX logger prob continued
>
> My personal preference happens to be CT. It is now free and continues to
> be supported and updated. It automatically generates Cabrillo logs. A
> postcontest mode allows you to enter QSO's made on paper logs during the
> contest.
>
> Most of the bugs seem to be out of the CTWIN latest version and the
> DOS-based CT version 9.92.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 kevinemtid@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>> I also use VHF-DX. It was the most simple and easiest to use vhf logger
>> I could find for the right price. Unfortunately the programmer no longer
>> supports it. I am not a programmer I cannot and will not(because I did
>> not write it) open it to change a few designations the ARRL decided to
>> make. I for one cannot afford to spend 49 to 79 dollars for a logging
>> program every yr. I did use the cabrillo form located on the ARRL
>> website just now and thank God I only had about 50 contacts to enter.
>> I don't plan on doing that again. I'll have to do some research before
>> the June contest or just resort to a paper log. Dave you are not Alone!
>>
>> 73,
>> Kevin KA1KOJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|