To: | <VHFcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers |
From: | "Bill Burgess" <ve3cru@rac.ca> |
Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:55:59 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Yes, I agree that multi-op rovers should be classed separately to a single op. It does not matter if they are using one or more vehicles, as all are working as a team under one call. We need this to level the playing field. Otherwise, the single rover doesn't stand a chance of winning at any time. Go for it. 73, Bill VE3CRU Email: ve3cru@rac.ca _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod, KY1K |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers, Tree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod, KY1K |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers, Tree |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |