To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed |
From: | VHFRover@aol.com |
Date: | Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:26:08 EDT |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
While we are at it, let's also consider setting up a separate class for multi-op rovers. It is very difficult for a single-op rover to compete against a multi-op rover station. If set up properly, a multi-op rover can operate, drive, and sleep at the same time while traversing many grids. This is another scenario that can and has added up to some very large rover scores. Mike WB8BZK/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Leveling the playing field (rover part II), Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, ADUHAWK |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Fwd: PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |