VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Self Spotting Was: APRS?

To: VHFcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Self Spotting Was: APRS?
From: Alex <extraham@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:53:52 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Hi Jeff,

>  And
> truth be told, is it really needed on 6 and 2 meters? 

I can understand you wonder about that. You are in FM19.

But imagine yourself in a different grid, say EM92 for instance. :) Operating a 
contest in a flat area where some portions are even below sea level and with no 
band openings to speak off, a VHF/UHF contest becomes rather pointless. You 
work a few locals and maybe 1 or two station over 100 miles away and that's 
about it. I love contesting, but this is downright boring. I can imagine that 
there are many areas like that in the U.S. 

It would be nice if we could get some help from the contest sponsors to 
increase activity on VHF/UHF. The fact that we're nearing the bottom of the 
sunspot cycle could be taken as an opportunity to try to interest folks in 
VHF/UHF weak signal work as an alternative for when their favorite HF bands 
have crapped out. They may already have the necessary equipment (HF/VHF/UHF 
rigs) but just need a reason to put up an antenna. Contests might help provide 
for that reason (in terms of activity).

If contest sponsors would allow for self spotting, we'd have an extra tool to 
increase activity. Our signals from down here are not going to produce stellar 
S meter reading on the back of the beams of station over 50 miles away. Chances 
are that they'll not even notice us. We need something that might persuade a 
station to swing their beams around towards us. I think that self spotting 
could help us here. 

Serious contest stations aim their beams in the direction of the highest 
anticipated activity or where they suspect or know where rovers are. Sure 
they'll swing their beams around in a lull of the contest (which will probably 
coincide with a low activity in the low density areas), but it's a huge crap 
shoot. It's also labor also intensive with low yield (think motivation). You 
have a better chance of running your keyer on a frequency aiming your beam to a 
high density area and make a contact with a lot less effort. I can't blame 
them. 

Packet spots create activity. That's why we have that tool. Let's use that tool 
to its full potential. Like we have a 10 minute rule in some contest, one could 
think of 15 minute self spotting rule. You're allowed to spot yourself once 
ever 15 minutes. Or maybe once per new CQ frequency. I'm sure we could come up 
with something if we're willing.

I'll be on the air during the contest. Not as a competitor but as an 
experimenter. 

73,
--Alex KR1ST
http://www.kr1st.com

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>