To: | "JT Croteau" <jt@w6cfo.net>, <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Loops - M2 or KB6KQ |
From: | "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net> |
Reply-to: | Jim Worsham <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:38:18 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I have used both and they both work fine. The only difference is the M2
loops are a little more heavy duty.73 Jim W4KXY ----- Original Message ----- From: "JT Croteau" <jt@w6cfo.net> To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:44 PM Subject: [VHFcontesting] Loops - M2 or KB6KQ I'm looking to purchase several loops for mobile use and trying to decide between those from M2 and KB6KQ. I've looked at all the various reviews and still can't make up my mind.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] Cell Sites, Jim Worsham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] iQuery: What about the Sprints?, Ev Tupis |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Loops - M2 or KB6KQ, Mike Coogan W7MGC |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] 432_Sprint, Bill Seabreeze |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |