To: | VHFcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [VHFcontesting] Cell Sites |
From: | "john ainsworth" <filamentman@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:02:20 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Hello Roger, Maybe I can offer a bit of help in this area as we have had many sites go up in the last 6 months. I know it is very tempting to go in with the attitude of " how much I will ask for , what other benefits I may derive from this rental, or what I may demand from them down the line." In many areas there are up to 4 or more service providers, some with shared access, "Colocation" and some with discrete access to wireless service facilities. The rental agreements will differ as the company has a range of what they will pay per month, usually for a 30 year term and what colocation fees they will pay, if any. The tower site will be under their control only, access only to their people or their contractors and of course they will have 24/7 access. I understand your RFI concerns and you can bet that the potential for their sites interference to you is a great concern to them and that alone could definitely be a "deal-breaker" for them. RFI concerns not-withstanding, I believe I could choose another band if I was getting +/- $1,200.00 a month for 30 years. In other words, there probably won't be any RFI but you will have to decide how much to press them because remember, "if you don't like this deal, your neighbor might!" This is all too true in this business as I've seen it happen twice in this limited market where I live. In both instances, the landowner demanded too much in return and the provider went to the next person on the list. Don't think you are the only person contacted by the rep. (They will tell you that you are the first owner they've contacted though.) They are searching for the best deal for their people too. Now if you own the "whole hill", you will be in a much better position to bargain. One last example, a very good friend was approached by a site rep and she didn't want that "hideous thing " in her back pasture. Well you can imagine what happened, the rep made a deal with her neighbor and he had them to agree to put the tower on the back of his property....you guessed it, 12 feet from HER fence! Now she has the eyesore and NO money. She won't go into the backyard because she gets sick seeing that "thing" staring down at her. So my point is first decide if you want it for rent offered, work with the rep and enjoy the dividend. The best tip I can give you is spend the day looking at other sites, contact the landowner and pick their brain for tips on what you can and can't get in the contract. I hope this helps. 73, John N5XYO _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] Cell Sites, jeff millar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Loops - M2 or KB6KQ, Mike Coogan W7MGC |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] Cell Sites, Jim Worsham |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] K1TEO - 432 Sprint, WA2TEO |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |