To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Rule Clarity (was: Rule precedence...) |
From: | "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:06:29 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
John (and reflector 'listeners'),In my opinion, the rules are unclear in this area and not necessarily JUST regarding rovers. I hear/read that there are numerous interpretations of this and other fine points of the rules from ARRL HQ/Contest Department (Hi Dan!). I am NOT suggesting that the interpretations are inconsistent in any way...more suggesting that, as a process, any such interpretations be circulated or made available to a wider audience, especially in cases such as this where the 'written' rules can be interpretted in different ways. Ultimately, such a process should lead to changes in the written rules to reduce (eliminate?) such ambiguities. To illiustrate: NOTE that Rule 1.3 in the Rules for VHF Contests, specifically mentions Rule 3.5 of the General Rules (Family Station provision) AND that VHF 1.3 preceeds the definitions for a Rover Station, VHF 2.3 and 2.3.1-6. Even though the VHF Rules take precedence over the General Rules, since VHF 1.3 (which references "General" rule 3.5) preceeds VHF 2.3.x, it seems reasonable that "accommodat[ing] family members who must share a rig" would apply to ALL stations (i.e. does NOT exclude Rover stations). NOTE ALSO that Family Members who operate the SAME fixed station are permitted to submit SEPARATE Single-Op entries and are NOT forced to participate/submit their entries as Multi-Operator (though there are some areas open to interpretation here as well...if W1BRO and K1SIS, brother and sister, are both operating their home station and pass the microphone back and forth, alternating contacts with other stations...might it be argued that the 'tuning in' of the station that is worked is either a 'spotting' or an 'equipment adjustment' that is done BY one person FOR a second person and in conflict with Rule 2.1, to wit "One person performs all transmitting, receiving, spotting, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments"). IMHO, it is a GOOD thing for the Rules to "accommodate family members who must share a rig." Further, IF it means that ANOTHER station (or two, as the reported rule interpretations for "Family Rovers" reportedly permit) will be on for other competing stations to contact during the contest, MY vote would be for the additional activity. My two cents... (ok, maybe only one cents worth). 73, JK _________________________________________________________________ Learn how to choose, serve, and enjoy wine at Wine @ MSN. http://wine.msn.com/ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence, Richard Clem |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2003 ARRL EME Competition Logs Received, Henderson, Dan N1ND |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence, Richard Clem |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2003 ARRL EME Competition Logs Received, Henderson, Dan N1ND |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |