VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based EntryClasses[was:Stupid

To: VHFContesting eMail Remailer <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based EntryClasses[was:Stupid Categories ...]
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:43:22 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
"Kenneth E. Harker" wrote:
> > (Element count) x (RF Output) = Entry Category is a great way to categorize
> > our efforts without compromizing our future by encouraging less band-
> > participation or band-reporting.
> 
> This formula is FAR more complicated than using an RF output threshold for
> categories.

Yet, RF output is the wrong way to calculate entry category.  It must be ERP
based.  Under today's rules...
o 201-watts into a 4-element beam is HP
o 199-watts into 4x 18xxx is LP

This is the wrong way to do it.

Under the ERP based proposal...the pivot point is 4,100 and...
o 201 watts into a 4-element beam = 804 = Low Power
o 199 watts into 4x 18xxx = 14,328 = High Power

> And why would you want people to limit (of all things) their antennas?

I never said anything of the sort.  This simply categorizes participation better
than the present method.  In fact...it encourages one to make sure that they get
every dB out of the number of elements they have!

Ev, W2EV
-- 
PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it?
HamIM  : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go to play.
         That HamIM, that HamIM -- I'm sure you'll like that HamIM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask me about either.  I'll send a URL and you can join the fun, too!

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>