VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Creating new categories for rovers

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Creating new categories for rovers
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:35:36 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Bill Burgess wrote:

> 
> When competing with those with more experience, the newbie rover needs
> all the help he/she can muster including in the antenna system,
> especially when it is multi-op vs single op.  I note in past contests
> that many get greater scores by running more bands even if running qrp.
> This naturally encourages me to put as many bands as practical in a
> contest.   Those of us in Canada have little to work to our north
> whereas others have lots to work in most directions, so we need the
> punch to reach farther south.
> 
> So please don't stomp on me too soon with new restrictions.  It reminds me of 
> my full ex-employer, no names mentioned, that kept adding steps above me to 
> keep people from reaching the top and management.
> 

To tell the truth, I get in on these VHF+ contests mainly to make some
QSO's. The bands, especially 222 and up, are generally so devoid of
activity in this area that I'm just happy to hear and work some people.
If I worked only one station but worked him on all bands from 50 through
10368 MHz, I'd feel I'd accomplished something.  I usually don't have any
thought of competition or winning.  Oddly enough, I've won Central
Division QRP-Portable a few times.  :-)

IMO, keep those bands active.  The more, the merrier!

73, Zack W9SZ

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>