VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Creating new categories for rovers

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Creating new categories for rovers
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:40:42 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Bill Burgess wrote:
> I note in past contests that many get greater scores by running 
> more bands even if running qrp.  This naturally encourages me to 
> put as many bands as practical in a contest.

> So please don't stomp on me too soon with new restrictions.

Bravo, Bill!  More bands = more score.  More bands = more protection against
band-loss to other interests.  Well thought out rules should encourage the use
of more bands...not artificially limit participation.

Here's looking forward to working you on as many bands as we can mutually muster
in January!

Ev, W2EV
-- 
PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it?
HamIM  : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go to play.
         That HamIM, that HamIM -- I'm sure you'll like that HamIM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask me about either.  I'll send a URL and you can join the fun, too!

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>