To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers |
From: | W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com) |
Date: | Tue Jul 29 08:36:05 2003 |
>> General Rules for ARRL Contests on Bands Above 50 MHz >> >> 2.3.5.All Rovers are encouraged to adopt operating practices that allow as >> many stations as possible to contact them. >Ah - I remember that rule.? I think perhaps I was on the CAC when it was >adopted. > >It was a tough rule to write - how do you enforce it? You write a new rule based upon an arbitrary percentage of the contacts in the rover's log that can be made with any one station. To me that is 49%. If half or more of the contacts in a rover's log are with one station he isn't trying hard enough to work other people. (Yes I understand it could still be abused unless the rule was written and applied on a QSOs per band basis.) (BTW such a rule would also have prevented abuse of rover squared type operation - the rules wouldn't have had to be rewritten - but that's another argument completely. ) 73, Jim w0eea@aol.com |
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers, dpease@adams.net |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers, Zack Widup |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers, Zack Widup |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |