VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Contest

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Contest
From: W1XX@aol.com (W1XX@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:31 2003
Happy New Year VHF contesting galaxy!

An introduction:  As has been announced in CQ Magazine, I have recently 
picked up the reins of VHF Contest Director for CQ's July WW VHF Contest.  
I'd like to take the opportunity to bounce a couple of ideas off the 
reflector re QRP entries.

First, however, I want to applaud Gene Zimmerman, W3ZZ, for his outstanding 
job in resurrecting the CQ VHF Contest from the grave.  Especially as a 
regular portable operations entry, I and many other have found the 6 and 
2-meter only format of the past three years a welcome relief from the real 
hard work of a 6m-to-light operation.  Gene has been most helpful to me 
during the transition.  We wish him well in his new duties with QST.

Re QRP -- I operated QRP @25 w out of necessity during the 2002 contest and 
frankly noticed little difference in my score from running my usual several 
hundred watts.  True, especially on 6 m, I may have missed the 2nd and 3rd 
layers of callers that would have been attracted to my QRO signal.  But I 
have also operated in ARRL contests with the ARRL defined 10 watts from 
mountaintop locations...and that will beat almost any QRO home station any 
time.  Also, so far in processing QRP entries  for the 2002 contest, all are 
at 10 watts or less, except two [mine is one] at 25 w.  Therefore, for 
consistancy between contests...and recognizing radios like the FT-817 and 
even the old Icom 502, 202, and 402 still much in use at lower power 
levels...that QRP be defined on VHF at 10 watts.  This segways nicely to a 
related concept.

Many of you know me in past VHF Contests as a "rare grid provider"....having 
operated portable over the years from 21 different [usually rare] grids, 10 
states and 3 DXCC entities....something I have found very rewarding.  But the 
biggest obstacle to such operations is the potential amount of work involved. 
 Eliminating weekend shelter and sustenance considerations as well as "can 
you drive there with all this stuff?"...can make for a more fun contest 
experience.  Thus, how about a subset of the QRP category called the 
"Hilltopper QRP"...which would be a quickee 6-hour operation...where you 
would either drive or hike to a nice spot with minimal QRP 10 watt 
radio....operate from the start of the contest 'til dark and go home?  
Perhaps from a rare grid square.  If you liked it so much and wanted to do it 
on the 2nd day...go to another neat spot in another nearby grid square...sign 
"portable (call area)" to distinguish it from the previous day's operation 
and rovers....operate six hours and call it quits.  How's that for fun? This 
"easy does it" approach could promote many more portable operations that 
don't require the heavy committment of a full-fledged operation...and be 
compeitive.

I am suggesting that we "unofficiallly" incorporate this into the 2003 CQ VHF 
Contest....give editorial highlights of participants in the results...and 
give certificates to the deserving.  If the response is good, put it in the 
offiial rules the following year.

Your comments and on these two minor tweaks and any other suggestions would 
be much appreciated.  73,

-- John Lindholm, W1XX
CQ WW VHF Contestr Director 


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>