I am in agreement with the rest of you. However, if
the ARRL were to reinstate contest line scores, they
would have to admit that it was a mistake to remove
them. When is the last time (or ever) that you have
seen the ARRL admit that they made a mistake?
73s John NE0P
--- WBR WF4R <wbr@verizon.net> wrote:
> I agree 100%
> Thanks for saying it Joe.
> 73,
> Bill
> WF4R
>
> "Joseph H. Taylor" wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Ok, I don't want to make this into the next
> code/no-code
> > > debate, but I really wish QST would re-think the
> removal of
> > > line scores. It sends the wrong message.
> >
> > My sentiments, exactly. I have tried to think
> about what reasons I might
> > have had, if I were an ARRL Director, to become
> convinced that contest
> > line scores were less worthy of QST space than
> several pages of, say,
> > color photos of things like random road signs that
> happen to have "Ham"
> > or the like in a double-meaning context. I find
> plenty in QST that is,
> > frankly, not very interesting to me; and I miss
> having the full contest
> > reports, even for the events I don't enter. I've
> been reading them for
> > 40+ years, and it's still fascinating to see what
> everyone else has done.
> >
> > -- 73, Joe, K1JT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > VHFcontesting mailing list
> > VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> >
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
|