To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Differences between TX and MI |
From: | n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ) |
Date: | Thu Jun 19 16:43:48 2003 |
I think what we can all learn from this discussion is that VHF (6m) has so many different modes of propagation that there is no single answer to Dave's inquiry. Being flexible, and prepared for almost anything is the key. From this perspective, the *ideal* installation in TX, MI or NY should probably be similar - and quite extensive. The apparent unpredictability of how signals propagate is what intrigues me about all VHF/UHF operation. 73, Bob N5NJ EM13pa |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Suggestions on Antenna Heights for 50 MHz, Mark_Hoffman@boces.monroe.edu |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Differences between TX and MI, Mark_Hoffman@boces.monroe.edu |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Differences between TX and MI, Mark_Hoffman@boces.monroe.edu |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Differences between TX and MI, George Fremin III - K5TR |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |