Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Good vacation antenna

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Good vacation antenna
From: Wes Stewart via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Wes Stewart <n7ws@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 21:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
  So you move the loading coil from the base of the antenna to inside the tuner 
in the radio (with some coax in between).  How does that affect the radiation 
efficiency/?
On Thursday, July 3, 2025 at 01:57:33 PM MST, Jim Brown 
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote: 
> https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/cha-ss25
That looks like a great solution, Dave! I strongly suggest against a 
loading coil for 40M, using a tuner built into the radio instead, with 
or without some top loading. Loss in short lengths of decent-size coax 
on 40M is pretty low, even with significant mismatch. An excellent study 
in QEX about ten years ago showed that inductive loading at the base 
greatly reduces the radiation efficiency, because it's at the current 
maxima! The study included the construction of multiple configurations 
of loading, and very rigorous measurements.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
  
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>