Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 Electrical Joint Compound

To: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>, "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 Electrical Joint Compound
From: W7TMT - Patrick <W7TMT@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:19:17 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
W8JI has recommendations and descriptions of the various types here:

https://www.w8ji.com/dielectric_grease_vs_conductive_grease.htm

73
Patrick, W7TMT

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Paul Christensen
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 05:02
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] PL-259 Electrical Joint Compound

After 15 years, a pair of PL-259 connectors have seized on mating SO-239 jacks 
used on an outdoor RF choke. Is there anything more suitable than Penatrox-A 
which is Au/Cu rated?  Ideally, I'd like to apply a synthetic + conductive 
grease on the mating SO-239 threads.

Unrelated, but while investigating the coax connectors, the LMR400-Ultraflex 
cable I installed about 15 years ago has started to decompose.  At the time of 
installation, I knew the Ultraflex version has a shorter life span but wasn't 
expecting such severe decomposition.  The jacket is crumbling due to its rubber 
composition.  This past weekend, I replaced it with gelled LMR400-DB for direct 
burial, but it's installed above ground.  Like the original LMR400, the DB 
version has a rugged polyethylene (PE) jacket.  

Paul, W9AC    


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>