Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Truth, Fiction, or Fantasy?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Truth, Fiction, or Fantasy?
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:08:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>


I don't know why you would give enough credence to a poll like this to bother with it, but considering that a very high percentage of hams (at least in the U.S.) primarily use VHF/UHF handitalkies, the end-fed (vertical whip with no real counterpoise) estimate might not be that far off.  There certainly aren't 779,545 U.S. hams on HF.

And 10% of hams understanding antenna technology might be on the high side.

Dave  AB7E


On 4/26/2022 11:44 AM, Edward Mccann via TowerTalk wrote:

This was recently posted on the internet by one of hamdom’s self appointed 
experts:

       “The Joe Hams of this world . . . where currently 60% of them seem to be quite 
happy with an EFHW antenna, 30% with an EFRW (Random Wire) antenna, and 10% understand 
antenna technology.”

Is this anywhere near accurate?
Could it possibly be so?

Are 60% of the 779,545 US hams (467,727) and 60% of the 3.345 million World-wide hams (2 million) really 
“happy with” or “using” an EFHW?

Or another 30% (233,863 in the US and 1 million World-wide ) “happy with” or 
“using” an end-fed random wire?

That leaves only 334,569 who understand antenna technology!
Even with a ballot with room for write-in candidates!!

I must have missed the survey, and certainly wouldn’t have answered “yes” to the “are 
you happy with an end-fed half wave or random wire.”

Comments?

AG6CX

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>