Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP
From: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:55:51 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I've already posted a copy of what N7CL posted to this group years ago.  His work, as well as the work of others, can also be found in ON4UN's  "Low Band DXing" starting on page 9-14 of the 5th edition.  The answer is there.

Additionally see: "A Closer Look at Vertical Antennas With Elevated Ground Systems" by Rudy Severns N6LF.  He recommends 10-12 elevated radials as a minimum.

Wes  N7WS


On 1/11/2022 2:15 PM, Lux, Jim wrote:
On 1/11/22 12:16 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 1/11/2022 2:04 AM, Ignacy Misztal wrote:
At my new QTH, initially  I set up inv U about 80 ft high with 4 125 ft
elevated tuned radials about 10 feet high.

N6BT, who has done a LOT of work on the topic of elevated radials, told me that 20 ft is a minimum height for 160M. When I raised mine from about 6 ft to that height, TX signal improved significantly.


But what is the *reason* for it working better.  Is it something as simple as "the currents in the radials aren't loaded as heavily by something 20 feet away as opposed to 6 feet away" in which case it's a sort of soft transition, and "going higher" is a matter of diminishing returns.


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>