Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole length vs diameter -- a theory question

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole length vs diameter -- a theory question
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:39:40 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/28/2020 2:13 PM, jimlux wrote:
The K-factor graph can be derived semi-analytically - there are several analytical expressions for the complex impedance of an antenna (and you can solve for where X is zero) over a restricted range. Or, you can numerically integrate the field equations - which is what people have been doing since the late 1800s.

Some of the math Jim is describing here is advanced college level. When we encounter design formulas, like the the Handbook, they are the result of having written and solved those complex equations. And often, the formula is a simplified version, based on certain simplifying assumptions (for example, that the wire is straight, round, un-insulated, and not close to other conductive objects). A more complex equation might take into account the effect of insulation, the effect of height above ground and the quality of the soil.

Modeling programs like NEC use various techniques to solve the fundamental equations for data that we enter.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>