Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] The hunt for a feedline fault - update

To: Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] The hunt for a feedline fault - update
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:00:48 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

To repeat the situation here ... I have roughly 150 feet of 1/2 inch Heliax from the tower to just outside the shack, a good quality LF4-50A connector to make the transition to about 20 feet of BuryFlex coax for the rest of the run, and a high power fault somewhere in the line.  The procedure I described earlier told me that the fault was probably 23 feet from the shack end of the feedline, which strongly pointed to a bad job by me installing that connector.

Before doing a bunch of digging, I decided to repeat the procedure except from the tower end of the Heliax.  The readings were a bit less consistent (no doubt due to the much longer length to the fault), but they ranged between 145 feet and 151 feet, with an average of 148 feet ... again pointing to the same location.

So I dug up that feedline starting at the house and working until I found the splice between the BuryFlex and the Heliax, which indeed was just over 20 feet from the shack end of the BuryFlex.  As soon as I removed the outer vinyl tape and the thick stretchy silicone inner tape the connection came apart in my hands.  The interior of the Heliax connector was literally as black and sooty as the chimney of my wood burning fireplace.  It looked awful.

So the fault has been found and the location was as predicted. Given that I had made eight connections like that and totally messed up one of them, it seems my QC defect level for that particular task is about 125,000 PPM.  Gotta do better.

By the way, I was wrong when I said earlier that TLW was telling me I had a dead short.  The graph only made it look like that, and a more careful look at the axis dimensions said that the dips for each frequency were always about 28 ohms resistive at the low power of my analyzer ... which makes more sense than a short for a fault caused by a high power RF arc over.  I find that even more impressive (the data, not my error), since it means that the location of even non-absolute anomalies (neither open nor short) could potentially be found by this method.

Hope this is useful to somebody.

73,
Dave  AB7E
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>