Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:04:57 +0200
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
http://disti-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/cdmelectronics/files/datasheets/4697.pd
f

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sonntag, 19. August 2018 20:16
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loop coax

On 8/19/2018 10:07 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
> Is RG 213 the best and most flexible coax to use

In general, RG-numbers are not a specification for coax. Rather, they 
define little more than the characteristic impedance and approximate 
physical size. This has been true for at least 50 years.

The only meaningful way to specify coax is with a reputable 
manufacturer's part number and data sheet for it. I agree with others 
that Davis BuryFlex is a good choice for this application.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>