Gedas,
Tnx for the info.
Looking on eBay I see several listings for RG400 from China. I had heard
Harbour Industries in VT makes a high quality cable. Not sure about the stiff
from China.,
N2TK, Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gedas
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 2:13 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Skinny QRO coax jumpers for station interconnection
RG-303 is a good cable but not as good as RG-400 or RG-142 because it uses only
a single shield. Also, I would still use RG-400 over RG-213 because it meets
his desire for a small O.D. cable and because he is using it for switching
filters etc where the higher shielding effectiveness of the RG-400 is desirable
and will offer better immunity to cross talk etc.
Plus, with a Teflon based coax you never have to worry about the center conductor
migrating from center, even under QRO and extreme heat and tight bends. I was
biased when I posted using RG-142 because I was lucky enough to find a 1000' roll
of it and have been using it for jumpers for years & years. But RG-400 is more
flexible and of the same high quality as 142.
It used to be that RG-213 meant an upgraded quality version of a cable like RG-8
(solid dielectric & VF = 0.66) but with two copper braids vs.
one. RG-214 was the same as RG-213 but used a silver coated copper center conductor
and dual silver coated copper braids for even higher performance and better S.E.
For MIL applications we used lots of RG-223, RG-142, RG-400, RG-214, and of course
tons of semi-rigid. I was very, very lucky when I was able to purchase five
left-over 1000' rolls of new RG-214 for, you don't want to know, and have enjoyed
giving most of it away to friends & family.
Gedas, W8BYA
Gallery at http://w8bya.com
Light travels faster than sound....
This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
On 3/16/2018 1:33 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
I see no mention of RG 303 and wonder if that's been discontinued.
for jumpers I'd use 213. If you need a tighter bend radius I'd
re-arrange or re-locate the connection points instead of using skinny
silver coax.
Rob
K5UJ
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk