Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] CM Choke

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CM Choke
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:30:17 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 10/10/2017 9:23 AM, Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H wrote:
Jim, I´ve seen someone else making a S11 measurement for CM choke?

Is that correct?

That's a reflection-based measurement, and has VERY poor accuracy when Z being measured is much greater than or much less than the system impedance (50 ohms).

http://www.lb3hc.net/archives/1358

This appears to be an S11 measurement.  The common measurement error is that the measured resonant frequency is much lower than the actual resonant frequency.

I always use S21.

This has the greatest potential for success, but it requires a load resistance to form a voltage divider with the choke. This is the method shown in that set of slides, and it correlated well with a set of round robin measurements done by others using classical methods (Q-meter, etc.). The choke being measured was wound on a material that seemed to be #61, thus a fairly high Q, and thus quite sensitive to measurement error.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>