Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter beam

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 Meter beam
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:59:00 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Fri,3/31/2017 5:37 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
I think a 4sq is about as good and it has greater
bandwidth.

Vertically polarized antennas are strongly affected by ground quality. If you have good to very good ground conductivity and have a good radial system, that 4-sq will work great. But if you have poor ground conductivity, it won't, even with a zillion radials. It's VERY easy to see this in a simple NEC model. Build a quarter wave vertical, put a 1 ohm load at the base (a near perfect radial system), model it with Very Good Ground, plot the vertical pattern (2D), save the plot. Then change to Very Poor, plot the vertical pattern, then add the plot of very good ground that you just saved. The difference is loss in the far field (FAR beyond where your radials end).

Horizontally polarized antennas do NOT depend on ground conductivity, they depend only on HEIGHT, and especially on low bands, higher is better.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>