| To: | "'jimlux'" <jimlux@earthlink.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not? |
| From: | "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:07:23 -0600 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
That works for me! Thanks Jim. 73, Keith NM5G -----Original Message----- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of jimlux Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 5:19 PM To: towertalk@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not? <snip> I think the take home here is that "more guys make it more rigid, which reduces the pucker factor when climbing" is the dominant effect. <snip> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?, J. Hunt via TowerTalk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?, Michael Tope |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: torque arms or not?, Patrick Greenlee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] torque arms or not?, Patrick Greenlee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |