Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] radial lengths ...

To: "tower" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] radial lengths ...
From: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:23:55 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
For the ‘experts’ out there ... 

So question.... in ON4UN’s book it is stated in abundance that one should use 
typically 0.25 wl radials... the length of course varies with the properties of 
the earth and the desired end results but somewhere around 32 1/4 wave radials 
seems to be within about 1 db of 100+ of the same length ... 

but he also states, kind of “on the side” in one sections only (it seems) due 
to the velocity factor attributed to the earth that 1/4 wave is actually 
physically only 0.14 waves in length! 

So which is it – when it is stated 32 1/4 wave is that physically 1/4 wave or 
is it physically say 1/7th wave (and still electrically 1/4 wave)?! 

so for example on a 160 meter vertical are we looking at 32 ~130’ radials or 
more like 75’ radials (with the end of each of those not having enough current 
in them to contribute appreciatively to the current distribution)... ?

I know most will respond with 1/4 wave.... but I’d bet most would be going by 
the generic statements of “1/4 wave radials for verticals”... if indeed the VF 
makes going beyond about 1/6th wave of very little value (again talking about 
32 radials here – not 120) ... then why go through the effort? 

if this is (more) clearly stated in John’s book please let me know where. 

Gary 
K9RX

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>