Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Sad news N5IA SK in tower fall

To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>, sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Sad news N5IA SK in tower fall
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:07:45 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A ham I know (W6REC) works as an "auditor" for cell site
owners (he works for all the big carriers in a
free lance capability).  He has the authority to
essentially act as a "bouncer" if he sees workers
on site working in an unsafe manner.  According
to him, the maximum height above ground where
free climbing is allowed is "zero", and
there has to be a rescue qualified backup
climber on the ground at all times.  He unfortunately
has to play policeman too frequently.

I didn't know Milt well, but he seemed
to illustrate why 160 is called the "gentlemen's
band".  Certainly, his station was a "beacon"
station in any contest.  Perhaps this tragedy
will induce greater safety in connection with tower work.

Rick N6RK

On 6/14/2016 8:24 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Problem comes when you are climbing someone else's tower. After you fall to 
your death, you don't get to participate in the liability insurance fight that 
ensues.

My understanding is that this wasn't his own tower, and the tower site owner 
should be very unhappy with his decision... If a commercial site, definitely a 
violation of their policies... Which is exactly how hams get kicked off of 
commercial tower sites, and new hams get turned down when they ask.

Matthew Kaufman


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>