Must be a slow week, ALREADY. Are we going to beating this dead horse again
about MOSLEY (not Moseley) antennas? ...really? -m
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Taylor
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 11:58 AM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV
Cc: dw ; [TowerTalk]
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Return on investment (golden rules) for
antennainstallations
It was intended to compare to the specific Moseley model, a disclaimer the
author clearly makes. He didn’t optimize the antenna because Moseley didn’t,
either.
He also admits he ignored the other lumped inductances in the actual
antenna, which probably hampers 20m efficiency even more than his model
represents.
I suspect that particular Moseley was designed to appeal to folks
transitioning out of a ground-mounted vertical, for whom the Moseley would
appear to be a big upgrade, primarily for being up in the clear rather than
for any electrical advantages over a dipole.
73, kelly
ve4xt
On Jan 10, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:
The model used for the yagi is far from optimum and contains losses
not likely to be present in a well designed antenna. The losses in
a half size element are typically less than 0.5 to 1 dB unless the
loading/matching circuits have extremely low Q.
That said, Moseley antennas have been found to be quite inefficient in
actual range tests (see the W0AX/K7LXC tribander books) to the point
of showing loss compared to a dipole on some bands.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 1/10/2016 9:27 AM, dw wrote:
I read an interesting article in eham where EZNEC was used to compare a
specific commercial beam to a dipole.
I guess I was a little surprised at the results.
The article is here.
http://www.eham.net/articles/35421
It goes to the question of whether or not a given antenna solution
represents an improvement significant enough to warrant investment.
I wonder how others formulate return on investment considerations.
Perhaps years of experience, and some "been-there-done-that", have
allowed you to develop some golden-rules about antennas?
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|