To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Return on investment (golden rules) for antenna installations |
From: | dw <bw_dw@fastmail.fm> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 2016 06:27:47 -0800 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I read an interesting article in eham where EZNEC was used to compare a specific commercial beam to a dipole. I guess I was a little surprised at the results. The article is here. http://www.eham.net/articles/35421 It goes to the question of whether or not a given antenna solution represents an improvement significant enough to warrant investment. I wonder how others formulate return on investment considerations. Perhaps years of experience, and some "been-there-done-that", have allowed you to develop some golden-rules about antennas? -- Bw_dw@fastmail.net _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] How far away from the shack for that mighty fine tower, Roger (K8RI) on TT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] copper or galvanized ground rods in red SC clay, Kevin Kidd |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] How far away from the shack for that mighty fine tower, john |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Return on investment (golden rules) for antenna installations, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |